Blog

Two schools call. Two NIL offers land on the table, both worth the same $400,000. On paper, that looks like an easy comparison. It isn't. What actually lands in the bank depends heavily on where that money gets earned, and that's the part almost nobody explains to athletes and their families before they sign.

Here's the same $400,000 offer, run through two schools: USC and the University of Texas.

These two weren't picked at random. They sit at opposite ends of the state tax spectrum. USC plays in California, which carries the highest state income tax rates in the country. Texas charges no state income tax at all. Between them, they show the widest possible gap an athlete could face on the exact same offer, just based on where the jersey says.

The Comparison, Apples to Apples

To keep this a fair, side by side comparison, these numbers use the raw $400,000 offer with no deductions, no business structuring, and no retirement account contributions factored in yet. Just the offer, run through each state's income tax brackets. Federal income tax and self-employment tax apply the same way in both cases, so those are left out here too. This isolates the one variable that actually changes based on where you play: state income tax.

Offer 1: USC (California)

California has the highest state income tax rates in the country, with brackets that climb as high as 13.3% at the top end. Running $400,000 through California's progressive brackets lands at roughly $33,900 in state income tax.

**What's left after the state's cut: about $366,100.**

Offer 2: University of Texas

Texas charges no state income tax at all. Zero.

**What's left after the state's cut: the full $400,000.**

The Gap

Same offer, same $400,000, and the state alone is the difference between keeping $366,100 and keeping all $400,000. That's nearly $34,000 gone before an athlete makes a single decision about saving, investing, or building a business, and it happens again every single year that income keeps coming in.

Stack that gap across a multi-year NIL career and it stops being a rounding error and starts being real money, the kind that could fund a down payment, seed an investment account, or cover a family's needs long after the playing days are over. That's the piece that rarely gets talked about when two offers get compared side by side on the headline number alone.

Think about what $34,000 a year could actually do if it stayed invested instead of going to a state tax bill. It could fully fund a Roth IRA contribution with room to spare, and still leave enough to seed a brokerage account that keeps growing well past the last year of eligibility. It could start an emergency fund that gives a family real breathing room. It could go toward a business idea, a down payment, or supporting parents and siblings without touching next year's income. None of that requires a bigger offer. It just requires playing in a state that doesn't take that piece off the top first.

What This Doesn't Include Yet

This is the before picture, on purpose. Real planning goes further: how the NIL income is structured, whether an LLC or S-corp makes sense, what a retirement account contribution can shelter, and how federal self-employment tax gets managed. Those levers can meaningfully change the final number in either state. But none of them change the fact that the state an athlete plays in sets the floor before any of that planning even starts.

Build The Decision On Real Numbers

At WIN Private Wealth, this is the kind of comparison we build for athletes and their families before an offer gets signed, not after the first tax bill shows up. Same offer, real numbers, side by side, so the decision gets made with the full picture instead of just the headline dollar amount.

If there's an NIL decision on the table, get the real numbers before the decision gets made.